As with still life landscape never used to inspire me particularly, or rather I would enjoy other peoples work but it never really excited me in the same way that portraiture of life drawings would and certainly I never felt much temptation to do any myself. All of my previous attempts at landscape have left me incredibly frustrated at my complete inability to translate something so lovely on to paper, but I’ve looked forward to being forced to address that! It’s good to have an opportunity to research other peoples work to see what it is that does inspire me.
I looked first as suggested at the work of Albrecht Durer – I found his watercolours oddly emotive. Something of their simplicity coupled with the age of them makes you feel that you are getting a true view in to another time that is otherwise completely lost. Often older paintings feel heavy with the hang-ups of their time – they need to be to a certain level or showing a particular kind of image and I don’t fee; that at all with these, it’s more like a snapshot image of how it looked. (See View of Nuremberg for reference.)
I looked next at Claude Lorrain’s designed landscapes – the polar opposite! These are incredibly beautiful and so full of drama, just the trees themselves seem regal and lifted out of the ordinary into something quite different. However the image I loved most was one of his sketches Landscape with Bridge which doesn’t have anything of that precision and premeditation to it – it’s just a beautifully done quick work more reminiscent of Edward Ardizonne.
I don’t think you can research Landscape without mentioning John Constable. His paintings have been so overused that it can be hard to see them for what they are but he was an extremely competent painter. Again these have that idealised rather too perfect look that does very little for me but his sketches (Such as Sketch of a Lane at East Bergholt) show how easily he captured light and colour.
L.S. Lowry as a rule I really do not like. There are aspects of his work that are interesting but I find the cartoonish people completely off putting. I can see he did something interesting by showing landscapes that up until then had been uncelebrated but it isn’t enough for me to be able to see past the people, I find them slightly grotesque – although perhaps they are meat to be.
Stanley Spencer in contrast really does do it for me! His garden and local landscape paintings are much more detailed and realistic than my usual taste I think but he does it beautifully and there is so much to look at! He often gives a lot more focus on the foreground than some landscape artists too which could be interesting to have a go at. My parents recently moved out of the old farm house that I grew up in – that would have been a perfect subject for this type of work, I might have a go from photographs – not at all the same but still useful practice. 
Rickett’s farm, Cookham Dene – Tate.
Paul Nash is another artist that’s really exciting for me. Regretfully I missed his recent exhibition at the Tate and I heard such brilliant things about it, but I’ve done a fair bit of looking at his work since. His more surreal approach involving unlikely objects in the landscapes could be really interesting to play around with. Often he places something right at the foreground – whether it’s an object or selected plants – it is very obviously staged but in a really pleasing way. One of his most famous pieces Landscape of the Summer Solstice is a good example, it shows too his lovely use of very toned down colour which again I’d like to have a go at.
I came across Charles Mahoney’s Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden recently and really loved it, again bringing fiction in but in a really fantastic and beautiful way. Adding figures to the landscape changes it completely too – I’m not sure I’m confident enough for that yet but I think that mix is something I’d really enjoy. As well as complete fantasy such as this he did a lot of really wonderful landscapes of daily life – brick fields or a school house – again that’s something I could look at.

Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden, Charles Mahoney – Tate
From a drawing point of view his study for Adam and Eve is interesting too – lovely use of ink and wash which is my current favourite media.

Study for Adam and Eve, Charles Mahoney – Tate
One of my absolute favourite contemporary artists is Paul Jackson, he does beautiful landscapes oil that are both intricate and very simple and he exhibits regularly in Sussex but he also does a lot of collage which he doesn’t generally sell but that I also love. I find these particularly inspiring as a different approach and way of almost painting with paper. This unnamed collage is from his Shipping Forecast collection on his Flickr account and is particularly impressive as a way of capturing clouds.

Shipping forecast, Paul Jackson – Flickr
I hadn’t come across George Shaw before and found his work really interesting. I can’t work out if I like it or not. There’s something I find a bit gross about photorealistic painting but I do like his choice of subjects – he has a real photographer’s eye for beauty in unlikely places, I’d like to see his photographs! I’ll never be a photorealistic painter but I would like to try more subjects of this type and living in Tottenham there’s no shortage of them!
Sarah Woodfine is another new artist for me and although I really like her approach I don’t generally like her work, it’s a little cartoonish for me though I think too that it would probably have more impact seen in the flesh. It has made me want to try using paper for a 3D landscape though – perhaps just cut paper or collage, or possibly trying to create layers of different texture with fineliner. Something to come back to.